4080 for 4k gaming reddit

4k for sure. The only downside apart from cost is that stupid 12+4 pin connector. 4080 is generally better for raytracing. Watch dogs legion and far cry 6 - almost 12. I'm contemplating a dual-monitor layout with the main monitor positioned for gaming/work and the secondary one vertically aligned for additional productivity . But I wouldn't recommend the card if you're choosing the card and have the option to go higher. Dude, high power 4080M is two times faster than Ps5. Obviously the 4090 is better, but is the $400 price difference worth the extra performance (obviously they both are bad RTX 4080 - 4k vs 1440 Monitor. Welcome! For PC's and general gaming, here's a good compilation thread or see below for the most frequently recommended taken from reddit posts. Also, in the source, there is a CP77 benchmark run, at 1440p Ultra RT preset. $429. Doom Eternal, Witcher 3, Metro Exodus, Civ 6, Warzone, Elden Eing, Age of Empires etc. Although in most games it looks more like 1440p. Frame generation and 4080 also the super variant is brilliant combo for this gpu, the 4090 can 60fps in many games native with ray tracing that GPU is on another level. Having a second monitor connected while gaming doesn’t make the GPU work appreciably harder. I honestly would buy neither card, the 4070 does not have enough vram for 4k, and the 4080S is to expensive. especially for 4k. Its insanely expensive but because of that performance its actually somewhat worth it. Majority of people won't upgrade multiple cpu on same platform though. I just sold my 3080ti to my brother for $500, so speaking from experience. Playing with 4k DLSS Balanced on your own PC will look maybe 5-10% worse than native 4k but it is still much much better than GFN 4k Native AND you will get way more fps because you are using DLSS. Generally things ive seen is the AMD card is putting out the same level of performance in games as the 4080 for £350 less. At 4k, it appears to drop FPS way down to 60-75, and even The answer is yes and no, because it depends on the game, the settings, and the rest of your hardware. 4080 draws 300watts if your cpu is consuming less The setup (lounge TV, AV Receiver and 20m HDMI cable) was previously working fine with my previous setup (gtx980) streaming 4k, no issues. As long as you have G-sync enabled, you don't have to have 165fps. The only time that the VRAM is used is while gaming (and working) and sense you are primarily playing on a 2K display, it is completely fine. If you’re hardcore, the best thing is to have a PS5 and a PC, watch reviews, and buy for the best platform. It was also 24% faster than the Radeon 6950 XT, and 25% The 4080 is a very capable card and more than adequate for 4K gaming, but you may have to use DLSS and turn down a few options. All the cpu difference test are mostly shown for 1080p cause thats where the cpu will most likely be the deciding factor. I got disparaged seeing everyone call it a 1440p card. Of course 4090 is better. If the next gen GPUs get less than 16% improvement on performance then it won't even be worth considering the upgrade and your card will still be relevant. Without a custom cables, it's going to be tricky to close the side panel. My use cases: Gaming and watching videos. However, beware, you will need a fast CPU, like the latest generation Intel 13th Gen or AMD AM5 Zen 4 CPUs. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. The 4080S is more than enough to get more than 80fps on most current graphics-heavy games at max settings (ofc it'll have reduced performance on badly optimized games like Starfield). The 40 series was a big let down in general except the 4090. 9%) **RX 7900XTX vs RTX 4080 (if we go by the performance numbers AMD provided) RDR2 : 93 FPS vs 99 FPS. Clean. What people who say x gpu is overkill for x resolution don't realize, is RT/PT are very heavy to run. i will play mainly at 1440p and 4k. Even a 4090, 4k ultra, rt psycho, dlss Rocking EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 in 4K - having absolutely zero issues with the card and with VRAM specifically. I recently got a 7900xtx, which is pretty much identical performace with 4080. And prices seems to get lower now. The “4k” on GFN genuinely looked like 1080p at times. The 4080 is good for high-end 1440P, and 4090 for 4K. So the 4080 is 33% faster in CP77 at 1440p. The 4090 isn't a better value for gaming, it is a better card for production + gaming and is not vastly more expensive than the 4080. 1. I´ve recently been all over the place when deciding for a cpu with the 4080. Then you just either drop the settings or go down to 1440p. -17. daniruoly. Price. Personally, I'd get the 27m2v or the C2. Therefore better value for 3D enthusiasts. Anything between 1fps and 165fps will be smooth and tear-free. no not for 4k. 4080 ITX Build for 4K Gaming. When on the 20m cable, widows has 'recommended' next to 1080 and if I select anything else, I get no signal. However, I can swap out or return any of these 3 components Generally yes. 43 $ per frame) 4090: 54fps (29. the 4090 is 35% better. 63 $ per frame) Despite being the ultra top tier card, the 4090 is only slightly more expensive on traditional raster loads and is actually more price efficient per dollar on ray tracing. Hello guys! Can somebody please tell me whether 4k gaming is feasible with RTX 4080 mobile? That is taking into account dlss2 quality mode (or fsr) high settings, no ray tracing. The performance was know as soon as the amount of SM’s were known. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. 4x the VRAM capacity so if you're doing professional Best budget cpu for 4080 4k pc gaming? Currently running a i7 9700k but ordered a 4080s next looking to upgrade my cpu. Dedicated streaming PCs are completely dead and obsolete since Ryzen/Threadripper launched and made CPU encoding on a gaming PC viable for high-end/professional users, modern GPU encoding just made it even sillier for the rest of us normal people. Vram: the 4080 isn’t far off FPS wise from the 4090 in many games, except when maxed out vram Is an issue. No way, its great for 1440p ultra settings if you want to play at constant high fps. I have a 4080 FE and 13600K, if you are including ray tracing along with maxed out details, then in my opinion no, a 4080 is not enough for 4K. The 4080 super definitely does the job much much better. Baddass @ 4K, my 3080ti averages 69,5 fps. This ain't r/PCMR, alright. 4080 can easily give you a great experience for years to come but if you are someone who absolutely must have all RT sliders dialled up to crazy levels like in Cyberpunk or Dying Light 2, the 4080 CPU encoding is also perfectly fine for most modern CPUs. Hey guys, I'm considering buying a QHD gaming laptop with a RTX 4080. Let’s just say the GPU struggles playing a video on one screen and gaming on the primary screen. Nov 15, 2022 · Page 4: GeForce RTX 4080: 4K Gaming Performance Page 5: GeForce RTX 4080: 1440p Gaming Performance Page 6: GeForce RTX 4080: 1080p Gaming Performance Page 7: RTX 4080: DLSS 3, Latency, and 'Pure The performance metrics are clear, the GeForce RTX 4080 series (yes both 4080 and 4080 SUPER) stands out, particularly in gaming performance and rendering quality. My arguments for 1440p: I don't know anything about GPUs, but I've watched several YT reviews on the 4080 and there appears to be some debate over whether it should be considered a "4k card. It sees an average of 15 to 20 fps improvement (if the game isn't already running at max, and the 3080ti is certainly capable) For example, in Control, without DLSS and max detail, max Ray tracing, the 3080ti gets an average of 65 to 90 fps. My 7900xtx can do 4k 120FPS in like 70% of the games I've played. As for the 4080 it is good for 1440p. i have this case with xfx merc 6900xt i love it but i think im going to return it cuz gpu are almost hitting botton it could be chocking. The 4080 is the bare minimum I’d use for 4K, with the 4090 obviously taking the cake. I’m looking to upgrade the GPU and narrowed down to two options: Used 3090 Ventus 24GB VRAM for $550. For 1440p a 4080 or even 4070Ti would suffice. 7%) COD MW2: 137 FPS vs 127 FPS (+7. It’s in a league of its own. Also purchased a WD Black SN850X 2 TB (@$100)I'm actively trying to build the rest to fit these 3 components. Cyberpunk 2077 4K with RT Overdrive, DLSS Auto, I get between - 65-75 FPS. Okay sweet. We won’t know just how much better until we get independent benchmarks, and AMD may very well come out with a competitive option too, if you’re not married to DLSS The 4080 is a good 4K card. As an enthusiast, I chose the 4090, but the 4080 is more than enough, especially if that 500 bucks can go towards some other cool stuff. The extra VRAM for the TI Super would admittedly make it last awhile longer than the non super but I believe performance is pretty comparable. I don't know if the card is enough for 4k with maxed out details. Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-6400 CL32 Memory. Issue is the price isn't, for 1k it's a insane amount of money. Would a PS5 get higher FPS on a 4K 120hz No, as of right now the 4090 is in a class of its own. Digital Foundry does comparison videos of games with graphics that match consoles. The monitors I'm thinking about are the GIGABYTE 32" 144Hz 4K Curved Gaming Monitor $579. • 1 yr. The 4080 was more the enough at 4K, albeit with DLSS on some titles. The 4080 is more than enough for 4k unless you’re wanting to play competitive games online. FatBoiMan123. 4070 700€ vs 4080 1200€ (price drop near 1000€ in some countries), overall near 50% better gaming performance and ray tracing 2k resolution, even more in 4k. Sure. After spending sn eternity debating on a 4070 super or 4080 super, here are my thoughts. Look up 4K RTX 4080 benchmarks of games you play on youtube. My thought process was that at msrp, the price difference justified the increased horsepower the 4090 brings… and it will only get better with driver updates etc. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. yes = get 14900k no i just intend to game = no its 100% a massive waste of money your honestly better of going with a 7800x3d build over intel its the best gaming cpu the 14600k or 14700k is also a good option but 7800x3d is by far the best bang for buck for gaming cpus. CPU Cooler: NZXT Kraken Elite 240 RGB 78. The 4090 is a 4k 120hz card for raster games and even on RT Games, you can get around 4k, 70-80 fps at DLSS Quality which IMO is overkill for 4k. 4080 will struggle to run newer games at 4k lol unless you’re fine dropping down settings. I could always return it if the results were sub par. Cyberpunk 2077 4K with RT Overdrive, DLSS Quality/ FG On, I get between 33-47 FPS. With the 4080 clocking 112,98 and the 3080 ti averaging 84,78 fps. It is the first card ive seen actually capable of high framerate 4K gaming without compromise. It is effectively a dead platform and AM5 or even LGA 1700 makes more sense for someone with a 4080. 4080 will be less bottlenecked in 1440p. Mw2 being faster is no surprise. I play a little bit of everything from single player to mmos, to multiplayer, to multiplayer FPS. Mobile 4080 perfroms like a desktop 4070 which is a 1440p card. Monitors aren’t even caught up to it yet. Also possibly look at the RTX 4090 for 4 GB VRAM more, ~10%/15% better gaming performance. Core i7-12700K and GeForce RTX 4090 build in General Tasks | Bottleneck calculation | PC Builds (pc-builds. 8700k/650w : 4080 doable (4k / Vr index) Debating building a whole new rig va upgrade. Item. 4k Gaming Build with RTX 4080 in Pop Mini Air. PCPartPicker Part List. I feel like the 4070 TI Super is the best value card on the market for 4k 60fps. ago. The RTX 3080 plan began to roll out about 14 months ago, bringing with it major upgrades to the systems running our games in the cloud, including Ampere-based GPUs and AMD Threadripper CPUs. A question about 4k gaming via an external monitor with RTX 4080 Laptop. just upgrade to am5 when you can afford it. 4080 S or 4090 seems like my best bet, and although the 4090 would probably be the best option in terms of future-proofing (as I am not looking to upgrade again for atleast 4 years), I can not in good conscience fathom spending Exactly. Can it push 165fps at 4K? yes or no depending on the game and settings. CPU. 99. Nov 15, 2022 · The RTX 4080 can deliver impressive 4K gaming compared to the RTX 30-series. I had a 4080 and a 4k monitor and I almost wish I had a 1440p monitor when trying to max out some games with Ray Tracing. Obviously using DLSS, a 4k monitor is perfectly fine for a 4080 but I wouldn't feel bad about 1440p. 4080 should be like $1000 at most. I can connect the 4080 up to my lounge directly with a short HDMI cable and 4k works. In some non ray tracing games, the fps difference between a 4080 and 4090 was often less than 10 fps, so not worth it there. Regular 4K gaming I'm honestly satisfied with and I'm always okay with not running things at the highest settings. Archived post. as long as i can hit 144 frames in games on 1440p and 60 frames in 4k im happy. For a 4090 to be worth it pretty much you need to play at 4k. Absolutely it will be better. I built this! (MATX) I've been loving my Pop Mini Air, I just wish it had all the color options of the full size. I want a 4k monitor for my new setup but I’m starting to see 1440 OLED/QD OLEDs and high refresh rate 1440 monitors. You need at least 38” to experience native 4k. Video editing on Adobe Premiere Elements and Cyberlink PowerDirector. 7900 XTX is faster in rasterized games. 4080 is definitely a card capable card of high refresh at 4k. If you mostly plan on using it for gaming at 4K and/or VR you should be fine, but if you need it for work for cpu intensive programs, or you want the extra 5-20% fps in certain games like MSFS 2020, then a 13600K or 12700K might be worth it. Hello! I'm looking to build my first PC, and I'm pretty set on going for an ITX build with the NR200P case. 4090 will be an overkill IMO for 1440p. Type. XMG Neo 4090 Laptop, not a 4080 I know, but its the same die, just lower TDP. If high FPS gaming is important to you then avoid 4k, if 4k means nothing on that small of a monitor just being straight forward. Basically the same performance except on games with dlss3, and even then the difference in 4k between a 3080 to 4080 is like a 5-10% increase in performance, which if you’re getting 60fps on the 3080, you’ll go up to 65fps. If you run exactly the same graphics as consoles, a laptop 3080 can already run at the performance that a PS5 runs at. Either would require/warrant a new motherboard and DDR5 RAM. I want to emphasize that the games I play are AAA games and have no frame generation support I do a lot of editing in Premiere & After Effects, often with 4K footage, and some light gaming every now and then. But the 4080 and DLSS and frame gen is a perfect GPU for 4k 60fps and higher. epd666. Great for productivity and gaming. 4 GHz 20-Core Processor. the 7900xtx is more inline performance wise with a 4080. No 7950X is just as fast and actually coolable. Really want 120hz 4k gaming (or at least 60) with raytraxing and ability to play sims in VR. 4080 is around 21% faster than the 4070Ti. so if we believe AMD'S performance numbers, then a 7900 XTX is almost 10% faster in MW2, but 6% slower in RDR2 compared to 4080. You would need a desktop RTX 4090 to get close to 120 fps at 4K with all the visual bells and whistles. I do use my 3080 with a 4K monitor and it's definitely playable. Bought at $350) and the Zotac RTX 4080 Trinity OC (which was a Prime deal. So you're left with a 4k@80-100 sort of middle ground under that 120fps sweet spot, but still better than 60fps. 52weeksout • 9 mo. The 4090 or the 7900XT for 4k and most bang for buck. I The new RTX 4080 SuperPODs bring additional power and features to the GeForce NOW Ultimate plan, formerly branded as the RTX 3080 plan. So it is not worth it based on the pricing you provided. 97 @ Newegg. The 4080 is in a weird spot, faster than a 3090 (a 4k@60 card IMO) but nowhere near as fast as a 4090 (a 4k@120+ card if you ask me, still need to tweak at times for 144). 4K would be noticeably better, but not mind-blowingly better for pretty much any use case except the desktop, where 4K really shines thanks to much better text clarity. At 4K, or with Ray Tracing, the benefit may be higher. You might see 1-2FPS difference in games, if even. It's currently coming out to around £2230/$2800 Comparing to what amd showed for the 7900 xtx on their website, The Rdr2 score is higher for the 4080 while the Mw2 score is lower. If you're set on upgrading your CPU, then a good upgrade path would be an AMD 7800X3d, or 13700k/14700k if you prefer Intel. They're both good, but the 4090 is the 4090. Even with the poorer optimization for PC, it will still crush the performance of a PS5 or Xbox series X. Nah 1440p is great with a 4080. -5. They are both big chonkin cards, but the 4090 will need an even bigger chonkin' power supply and case and generate more heat. Wherever you red that 16gigs for 4k isn’t enough is wrong. My current thought is to go for a 1440p, 240Hz (or higher) monitor for gaming, coupled with a 4K vertical monitor for additional space/productivity. In general though, you'll be fine at 4k@60hz. LetterheadArtistic26. I have both. 4090 seems better suited for those that might want to hook up to an external 4k display or a laptop with 4k panel those frame rates still suffer greatly, likely the 50-series to get it over 100fps average. com) Flip a coin. Nov 15, 2022 · 13 Game Average. Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI ATX LGA1700 Motherboard. Depends on the game and what you consider high framerate. Resulting in less heat and less fan noise. if 4080s fits in your budget, its the best option. PSU: Corsair RM750. Will it be able to output 4k resolution while gaming when connected to a 4k GSYNC external monitor via HDMI 2. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz Developers are in a hurry to get their games out to make money and end up having to patch a game for the first two years before it will run on anything worth a damn. Intel Core i7-13700K 3. For 4k it will definitely help but I would pick up a 7900xtx instead. The 4gb more vram is crucial in 4k and 2k with heavy RT on AAA and it is more future proof, then you can buy everything you like, but 4070 is only good if you keep 2k 60fps ultra A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. DLSS on a 4070 Ti will be better than what a PS5 does. This is why people say the 4080 is such a poor value. Buying any of the 40 series cards just for gaming is a bad value, but some people don't want value, they want raytraced 4k at max settings which the 4090 can pull off Ray Tracing: 4080: 37fps (32. It's only really heavy games like Control or Cyberpunk that you wouldn't get 4K 60fps with ultra settings and ray tracing enabled (and possibly no DLSS also). It is absolutely not overkill, I would say 4k is overkill for a mobile 4080. Note that the 4090 numbers use a 12900KF and the 4080 numbers are with a 7600X, as per the article. The build looks sick. With a 4080, 4k ultra, rt enabled/max, dlss enabled (without frame gen) it's around 55fps. Id love a great mix of frame-rate and picture quality. I will say the 4070 TI does do a very good job with 4K but I wouldn’t expect more than 4K60 out of it in the near future. Reply reply. 5900X , 2 nvme, 1 sata SSD, AIO 240mm. Ive read that you need a high amount of VRAM for 4K 4080 is horrible value at $1200 with 4090 at $1600. . 4080 has 16GB vram and wider bus bandwidth than 4070 Ti, also its 20% faster at 1440p and 26% at 4k. Opinion. more than that seems like just wasting money. Purchased a GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GDDR6X. So the 4080 is 31% faster in BL3. Ik the 4080 is a 4k graphics card I hear stuff like 4090 and 4080 are wasted at 1440p but I also hear people with 4090s playing at 1440p and they have no complaints. New 4080 FE for $1200. If you want a decent 4K gaming experience, you'd probably have to look at tweaking settings or possibly upscaling technologies in more demanding titles here. Like, a Gigabyte 17x 4090 at 3499 is a nice jump up from the $2800+ 4080 models. First time build, any other suggestions are appreciated. It's currently coming out to around £2230/$2800 with the parts specified below. GIGABYTE 32" 165Hz 2K Curved Gaming Monitor (170hz OC) $279. 1, or will it be capped at 1440? 4070 Super Review for 1440p Gamers. At low load, there is much of a difference noise wise as the fans are either hardly spinning or not spinning at all. For 4K you want tot get as much vram as possible so 4090 is the only real choice, followed by a used 3090/3090Ti if you can find one. The 4090 is the first card in history that can deliver a flawless 4k experience. Will 5700x3d bottleneck 4080 super in 4k 144hz gaming? Build Help Title, planning to start with some RTX minecraft but probably moving onto more demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 soon. Reddit in particular overrepresents high end gaming (Ie 120hz 4k etc), most non 4k players are still CPU bound thanks to games, excluding outliers like cyberpunk, generally not being much more demanding now than they were a few years back and playing on lower resolutions. Main games will be RTS, FPS and RPGs. 4070 Super is a little weak for 2160P@60, it 100% doable if you lower enough settings and nearly always use upscaling. At a normal distance of 60-70 cm, 27" QHD is quite good for gaming. Yes, it is wrong. 1440p is much better choice for the 4070. AliAbbasRTX. . Cyberpunk 2077: 111 FPS vs 83 FPS (33. Monitors are now made as a native 4K display, a native 1440p display or a native 1080p display and only provides a sharp picture in its native resolution, whereas an old CRT was fine displaying lower resolution with good sharpness. You’d have to push it further. Reply. A 4080 will do what you want further into the future than a 3080 , if you want to pay extra for that now. However, if it's between a better cpu or a better 4K display, I'd definitely get the better display. A 4080 will likely be playing new games well into the PS7. Looking to make a build for 4k gaming and video editing. 4080. Nvidia limited it so much that, although 4070 is mostly a little bit stronger than 3080 at 1080p and 1440p, it looses in 4K. CPU Cooler. The savings on the 3090 are significant and thus renders me unable to decide. For 32", 4K is a must IMO. It depends on the game. If the RTX 4090 was a beast at 4K, the RTX 4080 is far tamer and more of a direct replacement for the RTX 3080 Ti Almost all streamers & pro gamers play at either 1080 or 1440. Looking at average frame rates at 1440p, the RTX 4080 produced 189 fps, making it 12% slower than the RTX 4090 at 1440p. This is true for newer technologies such as OLED as well. Regarding future proofing, this is subjective, i personally believe in it and apply it when it makes sense, it works if you are willing to compromise, as an example, i went for 1080 Ti at release and kept it for more than 5 years before upgrading to 4090, 1080 Ti worked very well before showing Most ‘4K’ is 1440p upscaled. 4080 is a 4k @ 60-120 FPS GPU. Now! I've already ordered the 7800X3D (which I hear is the absolute best for gaming. Award. The same will likely be true for DLSS3 vs FSR3, except DLSS3 is available now. Still though, nowhere close to native 4k. 1440p 240hz for twitch shooters and 4k 120hz for everything else pretty much. Here’s the configuration I am considering: CPU: Intel Core i7-14700K 3. 27m2v is also a great 4k 27'' 160 hz mini-led monitor. If a 4090 isn't in your budget, you might want to sell the 4k monitor and replace it with a 1440. I play on 1440p/144hz. Of course, with the 3090 you get 2. This card offers better value compared to the 4090, achieving high-level performance that facilitates 4K resolution gaming. The 4070ti super is a worse binned 4080 GPU with more SM’s disabled while a 4080 Super is a better binned 4080 gpu with more SM’s enabled. Price gap between the 2 cards is around 150€ (1150€ vs 1300€, depending on the model) But right now Im leaning more for the 4080 because im not confident my PSU will be able to handle the extra power draw of the 7900xtx. This PC would only be used for 4K gaming and not much else, so I've tried to centre around this requirement while trying to stay under a £2500/$3140 budget. So 2gb of extra ram for 4k games is a nice edition over vanilla rtx 3080. Compare the clock rate (how fast the self overlocking will run) against the difference in SM’s. For 4K it will be ok. In order for the 4080 to achieve 4k 144hz the card has to work much harder to produce that vs a 4090 that has to work much less to produce 4k 144hz. Yes, it's 100% faster. So I guess the 4080 worth the price for 4K gaming. If you're trying for 100-120fps 4k with everything cranked up, not going to happen on a 4080. Only issue is some games aren’t ported well, so despite having better hardware, the game may run better on PS5. But even with ray tracing you can get well over 60fps. A 4090 is going to spend some time waiting for your CPU to do whatever it has to do though. Yeah, a 5600x isn't going to keep your 1% lows above 120hz in cross-gen games, so absolutely worth it for that card. COD MW2 : 139 FPS vs 100 FPS. Bought at $990). The 4080 is baffling at this price but don't pretend the 4090 isn't the best card out there right now with a sensible price for a halo product. 4080 seems the better value this gen for 1440p/1600p (built-in screens) as both the 4080/4090 is able to do 100+fps easily. But yes high fps 4k gaming is possible with the 4090 especially without ray tracing enabled. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. But even with the 4070 ti you could easily turn on DLSS or turn a few key settings Fps is around 75-80fps. AM4 was great and I've used it from Ryzen 5 1600 to Ryzen 7 5800X3D but I wouldn't recommend it to anyone except on a tight budget currently. I'm only on a 4070Ti and will target 120 locked often or 90-100fps with RT, so the better CPU you can pair with the 4080, the more you can optimise visuals If you want 4K, 4080 super is the best option. •. Killer_Panda16. 2. In our experience, the GeForce RTX 4080 allows an enthusiast 4K gaming experience, which means you’ll be able to maximize the graphics settings in your games at 4K, sans Ray Tracing. High quality 650w and 8700k and 2080ti now. 32" QHD is the same pixelated shit as 24" 1080p, just bigger, so it's usable, but sticknotstick 5800x3D / 4080 FE / 77” A80J OLED 4k 120Hz • Additional comment actions At launch, 4080 vs 4090 benchmarks had the 4090 as only 25-30% faster while costing 33% more and 4080s were available while 4090s were reselling for another 33% of the 4080s cost on top of the price difference. " At 1440p, it appears to be able to run at 100+ FPS for most games at max graphics, with RT on. Neither. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. 4080 has significantly lower power consumption. Fat_Cat1991. Many games that are available for PS5 and PC, I can play on lowest with my 1060 laptop. 4080, eventually price difference is gonna pay itself as it is more energy efficient, and it's gonna last you longer for sure. 4 GHz 16-Core Processor. 4K requires DLSS as is right now and needs new gpus basically every gen unless you want to decrease DLSS Quality or turn off RT/PT stuff. Since LCDs became the norm, displays have had fixed pixel distances. Im also aware that Nvidia has gotten alot of hate for the 4080 card being over priced for what you're getting as the 7900 XTX has 24GB VRAM compared 16GB on the 4080. In the tech industry I’m in it’s normal to earn $250,000 - $450,000 working from home. Even at 4K, turn in dlss, or just don’t use all ultra settings, because there isn’t much of a difference tbh. 5600 is fine. Both the 4070 ti and 4080 will hit 4k 60 fps in most games, like 90% of them. If you got the cash, spend it by all means. When I say I don't get high fps, meaning it's not potato level but not getting 140fps either. The 4080 can’t do 4K 120, at least not in graphically demanding games. The 4080 will work for almost all 4K gaming for atleast 4 years on high settings. The 4080 is better at 1440p than the 3080ti, by 35%. I budgeted $1100 for the 4080 super but got tired of waiting and grabbed a 4070S Founders Edition at Best Buy. and the reason everyone is suggesting these larger monitors/tv’s is because the 4090 is the first GPU made for 4k gaming. Maxed out dying light 2 consumes around 11gb VRAM. DLSS2 is very slightly superior to FSR2. Also keep in mind that in order to enjoy this extra 35% you will need a top-of-the-line CPU and 4K120 monitor. It should be fine for most games. A 4080 can do it if you play single player games and are fine with DLSS. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 02 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler. If you have like 1000$-1100$ to spend on a GPU in total, you could get a high-end 3080 like the Strix OC or the FTW3 Ultra, slap a 150-200$ waterblock on it, and enjoy stock (sometimes even higher) 3090 FE performance at 4K for only about 60-70% of the cost. look at gamer's nexus review on the 4070 Ti Super and look at the charts for how the 3080 & 3080Ti compare at 4k there isn't enough of a different to settle on the 4070 series at all if you have a 3080 card (IMO). js yi iy wu vx gu pf hk wx fj